Showing posts with label zhou tiehai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label zhou tiehai. Show all posts

Thursday, April 08, 2010

Zhou Tie Hai by Christina Xiong

Artist name: Zhou Tie Hai by Christina Xiong

Zhou Tie Hai, a local Shanghainese artist who works from his Moganshan Lu studio, is one of the leading conceptual artists in China. Although he was originally trained as a painter and designer, Zhou Tie Hai is more known for his satiric representations, and “poking fun at the absurdities lurking behind China's contemporary art scene”(ArtZine). After visiting his “Desserts” collection at MOCA Shanghai, I became deeply impressed by his ability and love for “conceiving ideas”. Unlike other artists, he does not paint his own works. Instead, the entire process includes conceptualizing an already-existing piece, directing his staff to create digitized replicas and to alter certain aspects of the original work to fit his own concept. All of the computer-generated images are done by his staff, which makes me wonder, for a man who admits that he doesn’t know how to use Photoshop, how is Zhou Tie Hai so successful?

Besides his unique implementation and perfection of air-brush painting styles from the 1990s, Mr. Zhou is an essential figure to the “emergence of Western modernism” (Allen) and influence in Chinese contemporary art. Compared to his compatriots, Zhou Tie Hai could be considered as revolutionary. Whereas local artists of his time portrayed Communist ideals, from Mao Ze Dong to “red guards with Coke bottles, Zhou created fake Western art and news magazine covers” (HoneWatson) Perhaps his most well-known works are the “Joe Camel” paintings, in which the head of this American cigarette icon is affixed to a variety of settings, from a European noblewoman to more recently, Koons’s “Michael Jackson and the Bubbles”. I believe that it is this rebellious nature and creativity of the artist, along with public’s openness and desire to see Western elements in Chinese art, that made Mr. Zhou one of the most influential artists today, even internationally. He once said, "The way foreigners thought about Chinese art was too simple," he said. "They just thought about politics. So I thought I'd do something different."

Friday, March 26, 2010

“Desserts” at Moca Shanghai

Christina Xiong

Title of Exhibition: “Desserts” at the Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA)
Artist names: Zhou Tiehai

When I think of France, I think of not only its lavish and yet violent political history, but also its fashion, luxury and beauty, all of which are aspects its language and food – as the title of this exhibition suggests. The collection hosts about 400 pieces, all of which carry the deep-rooted cultural and historical past associated with the names of 12 desserts: “diplomat, juge, ministre, prof, commissaire, sycophante, caroleuse, blancheresse, financier, bouffon, chiffonnier and sabotajnik”. When I had first entered the museum, I was confused, struggling to find a connection between the chocolate tart and a courtroom of judges, or a strawberry mousse cake and bargirl. However, it soon made sense because Zhou, with his ironic approach and amusing displays, is stimulating our “intellectual appetite” by offering us a different perspective on the character of French culture.

I was interested in the way women were portrayed at various points in time, from a replica of Marie Antoinette, to a ballet dancer, bargirl at a nightclub, or a professional model. Although the pieces were not arranged in chronological order, I did notice that each new generation had a more “sophisticated” connotation. Traditionally, whereas men were the breadwinners of the family, women were used for marriage negotiations, selling their beauty for a climb up the social ladder. Marie Antoinette, who once said, “Let them eat cake”, is very much like the cakes next to her. She is covered up with make-up and “decorated” with extravagant dresses. Ultimately, her sex appeal is what upholds or what has become, her status. As a woman strives to create her own career, an attempt to free herself from the binding social norms, she, like the dancer spreading her arms out, may succeed. Nevertheless, it is still difficult to permanently escape from the perception of inferiority. Even the successful models (seen on next page), coated with vibrant and florid designs, are like edible desserts.

Sunday, June 07, 2009

Shows at ShanghART and Bizart




There is a combined artists show at ShanghART, with our friends Zhou Tiehai, Shi Yong, and Yu Youhan and many others. There are a some interesting works in the show-- such as a wild millet-coated polyester sculpture by Wang Guanyi, titled "The Materialist" and collages by Xue Song. There is a really cool and colorful piece by Wei Guangqing, titled "The Zhu Family Instructions 19-24" that reminds me of a Justice song, with bright colors forming vertical stripes, creating the background for the everyday movements of moral righteousness as recorded in the ancient book of the Zhu Family Instructions, depicting figures similar to those seen in old Chinese scroll paintings. Each panel of moral instruction is labeled by a traditional saying that are timeless and can be applied universally, such as: "If others are experiencing good fortune, do not become jealous." I particularly enjoy this work because it mixes a kind of pop contemporary, modern culture, symbolizing the modern development of China fused with old traditional moral codes and standards. Wei does a great job incorporating the modern with ancient Chinese roots.


The Group Show at ShanghART Gallery runs from April 5, 2009 thru June 15, 2009.

(Photos courtesy of ShanghART Gallery: http://www.shanghartgallery.com/galleryarchive/exhibition.htm?exbId=2401)

Thursday, March 19, 2009

The Influential and Wealthy

I stumbled upon these two links this past week and it got me to thinking about the the current landscape of contemporary Chinese art and its future.  The first link isn't particularly thought-provoking; it's more of a financial news piece, but it does give a three-person list of the "most-valuable living Chinese artists".  Zhang Xiaogang, Yue Minjun, and Zeng Fanzhi, are, according to Bloomberg, the triumverate leading the pack of Chinese artists in the high-stakes business of art.  For me, the most interesting aspect of the article was its discussion about the profitability of Chinese artists in the current financial crisis.    According to Hurun Report's (self-billed as the "webpage for China's business leaders) Robert Hoogewerf, "'Chinese collectors had begun to take an interest in contemporary art, which was until then mostly of interest to foreigners'" and that the "demand for Chinese contemporary art grew slightly last year. Auction prices for this category rose in the first half and languished after the latest -- and worst -- round of credit crisis broke out in September."  So, it seems that the market for contemporary Chinese art is okay, at least for now.  At least the market for contemporary Chinese art is better than it is for other parts of the globe (see this Telegraph article for quick insight).

[The original report from Hurun can be found here].

The second link is to a post from Andrew James Art, a London-founded but Shanghai-based gallery space.  It was a response to a Chinese magazine's publication of last year's "most powerful 100" in the Chinese art community and in response, the folks at Andrew James Art came up with their own list, but called it the "most influential 100" to emphasize the influence that these artists/collectors/etc. have upon their peers.  Though I don't know most of the names on this list, it's probably a good list to reference as the semester goes by.

Anyway, these two links (in addition to being informative, quick references) prodded me to think about the commercial viability of Chinese artists.  I think learning about Zhou Tiehai's works probably influenced this vein of thinking, but it's probably something I want to return back to in a future blog post (and perhaps when I'm not feeling so rushed) examining what exactly is influence in the art community.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

ZHOU TIEHAI



It was a privilege to meet Zhou Tiehai and have the opportunity to view his works at his Moganshan studio.  It's always fulfilling to have the opportunity to understand an artist and his or her work through being in that artist's personal space (as opposed to a more commercial space, such as a gallery) and it was also exciting to view the works that he has yet to publicly exhibit.

Thankfully I read up on Zhou Tiehai before last Thursday's trip where I was surprised to find out that he actually employs apprentices who are the ones responsible for actually carrying out the physical processes of creating the artwork.  Zhou himself is responsible for conceiving of the work but then dictates the creative process to these apprentices.   Initially I found this to be baffling, but as I read more about his artistic process and the reasons behind this process, I gained more respect and a more comprehensive understanding of Zhou's artistic statement.

The readings from the second week all echoed a similar theme concerning the emergence of the contemporary Chinese avant-garde artistic movement: Chinese artists looked towards the West--towards Western artists and Western artistic standards--in conceiving their identities as Chinese artists.  Zhou's works stand out from these artists in that he re-appropriates Western works instead of letting a dominant Western artistic mode appropriate his identity as a Chinese artist.  He does so with whimsical (yet decidedly calculated) kitsch and a playful irony that is rooted in a transnational medium so indispensible in today's cultural economy that fluency in neither English nor Mandarin matters.  This medium is popular culture* and he reinterprets something as iconic (and American) as Joe Camel into a canvas that is open for interpretation and alteration by a Chinese artist.

Regarding the Western perception of the emergence of new and avant-garde art in late-80s and early-90s China, Zhou said in this (incredibly helpful and informative) New York Times article that, "The way foreigners thought about Chinese art was too simple.  They just thought about politics."  This quote was particularly striking as I was curious to hear if he thought this foreign perception of Chinese art has changed.  He replied that it hadn't.

Continuing in this vein of challenging Western notions of Chinese art through appropriating facets of Western popular culture, Zhou's latest venture Recherche is certain to inspire conversation concerning Zhou's role as an artist (after all, he conceptualized the idea but has French bakers create the desserts) and about the ties that food has to nation and memory.  Just as mapo doufu elicits fond nostalgia for someone who was raised with Chinese culture, the French desserts will inevitably elicit connections with decidedly non-Chinese ties.  But ultimately, it is Zhou's conceptual output that is responsible for the creation of this French dish and does Zhou's artistic stamp make the work Chinese?  (And also, is it not a bit coincidental that the Zhou's title is Recherche, which echoes Proust's À la Recherche du Temps Perdu, a novel that began with the involuntary memory triggered by a bite of a tea-soaked madeleine?).

As long as this post has been, I actually have more (yes, more) unanswered questions that arose from researching Zhou, but for the sake of time, I'll just go ahead and type them all out.  They're just questions to ponder, not necessarily answer:  What does Zhou Tiehai's distinct and decisive use of other artists to complete his works say about his own identity as an artist? Does the fact that he does not partake in the physical construction of the of his works demean his status as a legitimate artist (which of course begs the question of what a “legitimate artist” even is)? What does decision to not physically create his own artworks mean?  Does art just exist in conception and idea? Where does an artist's responsibility for an artwork begin and end?

*Though my assertion of culture as a medium here is certainly open to debate.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

camels...

Just wanted to quickly mention the visit to ShanghART...  What is everyone's reaction to the camel paintings by Zhou Tiehai? I really didn't like them. They looked like cheap posters that are sold at low-end malls. Maybe he's trying to say something about appropriation, but the paintings made me want to look in the opposite direction. Also, I don't feel that the concept behind his juxtaposition is that original or interesting. On the other hand, I felt somewhat drawn to the airbrushed pictures of the three women, but I think it was because they reminded me of Richard Prince's early magazine clipping photos (which are also fairly boring). 

I just found a link which explains the reasoning behind the camel... but I'm still not sold. 

Sunday, March 09, 2008

Positions on Chinese Modernity

List of Articles from Chinese Art Magazine


Leng Lin, 'The China Dream' (vol.1, no.1, 3-5)
Pi Li, 'My life, my decision: the political nature of Chinese contemporary art' (vol.2, no.5, 15-18)
Yin Jinan, 'What next, Ultra-Postmodernism?' (vol.1, no.4, 9-11)
Zhu Qi, 'Do Westerners really understand Chinese avant garde art?' (vol.2, no.3, 13-17)

Surveys of issues and tendencies

Leng Lin, 'Nine Chinese artists' (vol.1, no.5, 3-7)
(Wang Guangyi, Yu Youhan, Li Shan, Yue Minjun, Yang Shaobin, Liu Wei, Qi Zhilong, Zeng Fanzhi, Guo Jin)
Liao Wen, 'The turbulent history of Chinese feminist values and art' (vol.1, no.2, 3-7)
Li Xianting, 'The pluralistic look of Chinese contemporary art since the mid-nineties' (vol.2, no.1, 3-14)
Li Xianting, 'Some more thoughts on the raison d'��tre of Gaudy Art' (vol.2, no.2, 3-14)
Pi Daojian, 'The history of black-and-white: fifty years of evolution in ink and wash' (vol.2, no.5, 3-13)
Pi Li, 'Threading our way through the images' (vol.1, no.3, 9-11)
Shimizu Toshio with Robert Bernell, 'Chinese contemporary photography and video art' (vol.2, no.5, 26-30)
Wang Yiyang with Robert Bernell, 'The Collection of Dongyu Museum of Fine Arts' (vol.2, no.3, 19-23)
Yang Xiaoyan, 'A glimpse into recent contemporary art in Guangzhou' (vol.1, no.4, 3-7)
Yang Wei, 'Chinese contemporary art after the move from Yuanmingyuan to Songzhuang' (vol.2, no.5, 20-23)
Yi Ying, 'Bad painting' (vol.1, no.3, 3-7)
Zhu Qi, 'Why has art become so pretty of late? : an analysis of Chinese avant garde art in the late nineties' (vol.2, no.3, 3-11)

Reviews and Events

Yi Ying, 'First annual Chinese Contemporary Art Award: a new perspective' (vol.1, no.6, 3-4)
Ai Weiwei with Robert Bernell, 'The first Chinese contemporary art awards' (vol.1, no.6, 7-8)
Mathieu Borysevicz, 'On Inside Out' (volume 1, no.6, 22-25)
Leng Lin, 'Shi wo / It's Me' (Vol.1, no.6, 28-29)
Bull, Hank, 'Second Shanghai Biennale' (vol.1, no.6, 38-39)
Stephanie Tasch, 'Fast>> Forward: new Chinese video art' (vol.2, no.2, 34-37)
Stephanie Tasch, 'Art for Sale' (vol.2, no.3, 37-41)
Li Xianting, from 'Polyphenolrene' (vol.2, no.3, p.43)
Chinese Art at the Venice Biennale:
Francesca Dal Lago: The Virtual Reality of Chinese Contemporary Art (vol.2, no.4, 3-10)
Monica Dematt��: Chinese art...It's dAPERTutto! (vol.2, no.4, 12-23)

Materials

Artist materials
Ai Weiwei with Robert Bernell (vol.1, no.6, 8-11)
Cai Guoqiang by Huang Du (vol.1, no.5, 12-13)
Cai Guoqiang by Britta Erickson (vol.2, no.4, 29-32)
Ding Yi by Monica Dematt�� (vol.1, no.2, 13 )
Gu Wenda by Pamela Kember (vol.2, no.3, 28-33)
Hong Lei & Wu Xiaojun by Leng Lin (vol.1, no.5, 9)
Huang Yongping by Huang Du (vol.1, no.5, 12-14)
Huang Yongping by Mathieu Borysevicz (vol.2, no.4, 33-35)
Liu Xiaodong by Yi Ying (vol.1, no.1, 7-8)
Liu Wei by Li Xianting (vol.1, no.2, 9-10)
Ma Liuming by Mathieu Borysevicz (Vol.1, no.6, 43)
Xie Nanxing by Harald Szeemann (vol.1, no.6, 14-15)
Xu Bing by Britta Erickson (vol.1, no.4, 13-18)
Yang Mian by Harald Szeemann (vol.1, no.6, 15-16)
Zhan Wang by Britta Erickson (vol.2, no.3, 24-26)
Zhuang Hui by Mathieu Borysevicz (vol.1, no.4, 20-24)
Zhang Peili by Mathieu Borysevicz (vol.2, no.2, 31-32)
Zhang Peili with Francesca Dal Lago (vol.2, no.4, 25-27)
Zhang Xiaogang by Zhang Xiaogang (vol.1, no.2, 12)
Zhou Tiehai by Harald Szeemann (vol.1, no.6, 13-14)
Zhou Tiehai by Natalie Tasch (vol.1, no.6, 18-19)

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Bizart this Fall

9月SEPTEMBER 2007

2007皮埃.埃尔创作奖提名展
2007 Pierre Huber Creation Prize
Nominees Exhibition
Opening: September 4th, 2007, Tuesday 18:30
Press Conference: September 4th, 2007, Tuesday 19:00
Exhibition dates: September 5th to 10th, 2007, from 11:00 to 18:00

Organizer: China Art Academy
Co-organizer: New Media Art Department, China Art Academy
Venue: BizArt Art Center
Nominated artists:
Dong Dayuan, Jiang Zhuyun, Lu Yang, Shi Chuan, Wang Xin, Ma Xiaoxiao,
Sun Huiyuan, Xiao Yuankun


About Pierre Huber New Media Art Creation Prize and Fund

On September 7th, 2006, Mr. Pierre Huber met with the students of the
New Media Art Deparment of the China Art Academy and inquired about the
education situation.
In view of stimulating New Media Art Creation, education and diffusion,
as well as encouraging and supporting creative activities of the new
media art students, Mr. Pierre Huber founded the "Pierre Huber" New
Media Art Creation Prize and Fund.

The grant will finance a small management group in charge of
supervising the use of the fund, and formulate a regulation system.

Part of the grant will fund the "Pierre Huber New Media Art Creation
Prize" to support over the years the creativity of outstanding
students. Three prizes will be awarded to the students.
Fund will also be used to support students' creativity: students will
directly submit their project which will be examinated and subsidized
by the management group. At last, part of the grant will finance
studies of prominent new media art students with family difficulties.
Reward process will be composed of two phases: first, teachers will
nominate skillful students, who will participate to an exhibition. The
second phase will be the final selection by a jury made of renowned
curators and artists.
Jury will be composed of five members selected each year from a list,
members will change from a year to another.

Jury members list:
Beijing: Fei Dawei, Pili, Karen Smith, Wang Gongxin, Lu Jie
Shanghai: Zhang Qing, Zhou Tiehai, Xu Zhen, Yang Zhenzhong, Lorenz
Helbling, Chen Jieyang, Lin Shumin, Yang Fudong
Guangzhou: Huang Zhuan
Abroad: Hou Hanru (U.S.A., France, China), Hans Ulrich-Obrist (U.S.A.,
France), Barbara London (U.S.A.), Zheng Shengtian (Canada), Yves
Aupetitallot (France), Zhang Ga (U.S.A., China).

韩国艺术家朴芝恩和中国艺术家李平虎的展览
Exhibition of Jee Eun Park (Korea) and Li Pinghu (China)

Opening: September 14th, 2007, Friday (18:30)
Exhibition Dates: September 15th � September 28th, 2007 (11:00 � 18:00)

Exhibition of the artworks produced by Korean artist, Jee Eun Park,
during her residency in BizArt and the works produced by Chinese
artist, Li Pinghu, during his residency in Ssamzie Space, Seoul. The
exhibition will be held in September in BizArt for one week.

10月October 2007
仔细想想,昨天你究竟干嘛去了? -- 施勇个展
Let's think, where have you been yesterday? --Shi Yong's solo
exhibition

开幕时间:2007年10月12日,星期五 (18:30)
展览时间:2007年10月13日-10月22日 (11:00 � 18:00)

Opening: October 12nd, 2007, Friday (18:30)
Exhibition Dates: October 13rd �October 22nd, 2007 (11:00 � 18:00)

往事 � 被遗忘的时光
6位印尼艺术家阐释的印尼历史, 1930-1960
The Past - The Forgotten Time
Six Indonesian artists interpret Indonesian history, 1930 - 1960

Opening: October 25th, 2007, Thursday (18:30)
Exhibition Dates: October 26th � November 11st, 2007 (11:00 � 18:00)


Introduction:
This exhibition represents a variety of perspectives focusing on the
struggle of "Becoming Indonesia" during the period between 1930 and
1960. Personal stories mixed with formal facts to indicate how the
colonial situation became a major part in the attempt to formulate an
Indonesian identity. Beginning with the visual forms produced by these
artists, we learn to remember and reflect on the past and, together,
oppose forgetting.

Thursday, June 07, 2007

From Propaganda to Profit

------------------------
From Propaganda to Profit
June 2007

by Rebecca Catching and Anurag Viswanath

This spring at Moganshan Lu, Shanghai's main art district, Beijing Art
Now Shanghai christened their gallery opening with a rather
unconventional exhibition, "Shanghai Now." Viewers entered the
cavernous warehouse and stared blankly at canvases sheathed in money.
Gallery founders Huang Liaoyuan and Zhang Haoming had wrapped each
painting in shiny wrapping paper printed with faces of various
different currencies. In doing so, they sought to remind viewers to
look beyond the commercial value of art and contemplate its intrinsic
value.

Xu Beihong's 1939 work Put Down Your Whip sold at a recent auction in
Hong Kong for a record $9.2 million.

It's a relevant point in the context of the Chinese art market, which
some claim has begun to spin out of control. Last year, Sotheby's and
Christie's sold $190 million worth of Asian contemporary art—most of
it Chinese. Prices reached unprecedented heights, with 43-year-old
artist Liu Xiaodong dropping canvases for a whopping $2.7 million, and
Xu Beihong's The Slave and Lion smashing the record for a Chinese oil
painting at $6.9 million.

Twenty years ago Chinese artists would have had trouble obtaining a
passport, but now they are globetrotters. They have studios at home
and abroad, showcase their art around the world, and are getting very
rich in the process. Why this boom? According to Simon Groom, head of
exhibitions at the Tate Liverpool, the Chinese art explosion "reflects
the interest in China, driven by the growth of its economy, the
emergence of Chinese collectors and an eagerness in the West for new
speculative markets."

Tate Liverpool's current exhibition "The Real Thing: Contemporary Art
from China" features 26 works by 18 leading Chinese artists, including
Ai Weiwei, Gu Dexin, Zhou Tiehai and the Yangjiang group. The exhibit
has been billed as the "show of the year" and is evidence of the
growing influence of Chinese artists abroad. Indeed, many of China's
most exciting artists are now based abroad—for example Xu Bing and Cai
Guoqiang—which puts them in close proximity to their collectors, 90%
of whom are foreign.

Yet mainland Chinese collectors are starting to get into the Chinese
art game, too. Catering to their needs are hundreds of mainland
galleries and auction houses which are springing up, as well as
foreign institutions that are in the process of opening branches in
China, such as the Centre Pompidou and the Guggenheim.

Auction houses, both foreign and local, have begun to deal directly
with the top-tier Chinese artists, snatching up works while the paint
is still wet, rather than going through collectors and galleries. Some
artists have responded to the demand by using teams of assistants to
churn out paintings. For example, Shanghai-based artist Zhang Huan
employs close to 100 workers in a massive studio that would make Andy
Warhol's factory look like a cottage industry.

A Long March

Under Mao, art was meant to "serve the people," i.e., workers,
peasants and soldiers—social groups not known for their inclination
toward the arts. And the bureaucratic controls designed to oversee
Mao's utopian social-engineering projects quickly made art subservient
to politics.

Artists were disseminators of propaganda, celebrating revolutionary
zeal and socialist euphoria through patriotic paintings. Icons of this
era include Dong Xiwen's oil The Founding of the Nation (1953), Jin
Shangyi's painting Mao Zedong at the December Conference (1961), and
Wu Hufan's Atom Bomb (1965), which marked China's coming of age as a
nuclear power.

Woodblock prints and oils done in the Soviet socialist realism style
featured square-jawed men leading China's industrialization, and
robust women harvesting bumper crops of plump rockmelons, while folk
paintings known as nianhua, or New Year's paintings, depicted bouncing
baby boys riding atop golden fish adorned with communist slogans.

Under the oppressive Cultural Revolution, a new genre, a variation on
socialist realism described as "red, bright and luminous" (hong,
guang, liang), celebrated the accomplishments of the Cultural
Revolution with the use of theatrical illumination and garish colors.
The fall of the Gang of Four in 1976 brought new beginnings, as both
artists and art schools were rehabilitated.

Deng Xiaoping's "opening and reform" in 1978 and the preoccupation of
the state with economics allowed for expanded realm of individual
freedom and space. The officially sponsored "New Spring" art
exhibition in February 1979, followed by an exhibition by the Stars,
paved the way for the rise of the Contemporaries, which included
artists such as Wang Huaqing, Sun Weiman and Zhang Hongtu. The
establishment of Fine Arts in China (Zhongguo Meishu Bao) in 1985, a
Bejing-based weekly arts newspaper; the formalization of official
channels for sale of art by the New York-based Hefner Gallery in
1987-89; and the Chinese Nude Oils exhibition in 1989 were important
milestones which led to the culmination of what some consider the
Tiananmen of the art world: the highly controversial, socially
critical "China/Avant Garde" exhibition at the Chinese National Art
Gallery in February 1989.

Following Tiananmen, the art scene limped back to normalcy after a
brief hiatus. In the following decade, the first art galleries, such
as Red Gate Gallery and Courtyard Gallery in Bejing, and Shanghart and
Eastlink in Shanghai, began to pop up, with clients including
influential foreign collectors such as Uli Sigg and Pierre Huber.

In the years that followed art was no longer used to further the aims
of communism, rather communist imagery was used further the aims of
individual artists who made a fortune off of genres such as political
pop.

Artists such as Wang Guangyi and Xue Song, produced technicolor images
of Mao and graphic paintings of workers. While cynical realists such
as Liu Xiaodong, Yue Minjun and Zhang Xiaogang employed both
hysterical and forlorn human figures in everyday scenes, giving visual
expression to the moral vacuum left behind by communism.

Towards the late 90s, artists began really test the limits of their
freedom with exhibitions such as the "Fuck Off" biennale satellite
exhibition curated by Ai Weiwei at Eastlink in 2000, and Cang Xin's
performance piece To Add One Meter to an Unknown Mountain, where he
piled the summit of a mountain with the bodies of his friends—an
oblique reference to the terror induced by the Cultural Revolution.
Though artists experienced a palpable growth in artistic freedom
through out the 90s and onwards, plainclothes spies from the cultural
bureaus made their presence felt, asking to speak to artists, removing
works, shutting down exhibitions and occasionally holding artists in
prison.

In 2006, the Hei Shehui collective—literally "hey, society" and also a
pun on the Chinese word for mafia—organized the controversial "38 Solo
Exhibitions" in a former army barracks in Shanghai. The exhibition
featured Jin Feng's provocative performance piece An Appeal Without
Words, which comprised a group of actual peasants covered head to toe
in a layer of gold paint, brandishing empty placards—a reference to
their compromised status in appealing land disputes. Such incendiary
work caused the show's closure and landed two of the artists in jail.
New-art observer Geremie Barmé likens the situation to Miklos
Haraszti's Velvet Prison. In such an environment, the majority of
artists choose not to test the limits, and social critique often takes
a back seat to profit.

In some ways, profit poses a more pernicious threat to creativity than
government censorship, as galleries pressure artists to create works
to feed the market. "Now that [the art world] has become
commercialized, these commercial forces inform artists if something
has commercial value," opines controversial conceptual artist Xu Zhen.
Mr. Xu, who spends much of his time working at nonprofit experimental
art center BizArt, pays little attention to the market. Rather he
chooses to raise questions about transparency and China's growing
military ambitions—filming videos of himself driving remote control
tanks into China's neighboring countries and staging mockumentaries of
engineers lopping off the top of Mount Everest.

While the success stories, such as Zhang Xiaogang and Yue Minjun,
dominate the business pages of the Western press, many critics see
them as examples of how Chinese art has failed to innovate. Outside of
the works of a small group of exceptional conceptual artists, much of
what lines gallery walls is uninspiring and derivative. Pia Camilla
Copper, a Chinese contemporary art specialist at the Paris auction
house Artcurial, says, "The painters, sculptors and conceptual artists
from [China's top academies] are technically skilled, they only lack
imagination. A sort of Turner Prize should be created for Chinese art
to encourage young artists to break free from academic rules, the
scourge of the Chinese art academy, and innovate."

At the same time, experimental art is stifled by the lack of
institutional resources. Museums are underfunded, as are nonprofit art
centers such as Shanghai's BizArt and Yunnan's Lijiang Studio. Serious
art criticism is also compromised by corruption amongst journalists
and critics who offer coverage and praise for a fee.

Ms. Catching is the arts and entertainment editor of that's Shanghai,
and the Shanghai correspondent for Art Asia Pacific. Ms. Viswanath is
a free-lance journalist based in Bangalore.

Thursday, January 04, 2007

In China’s New Revolution, Art Greets Capitalism

In China’s New Revolution, Art Greets Capitalism
By DAVID BARBOZA
Published: January 4, 2007

Images:http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2007/01/03/arts/20070104_ARTI_SLIDESHOW_2.html

SHANGHAI, Jan. 3 — After the peppered beef carpaccio and before the pan-fried sea bass there were raucous toasts and the clinking of wine glasses in the V.I.P. room of New Heights, a jazzy restaurant in this city’s most luxurious location, overlooking the Bund.

Wang Guangyi, one of China’s pioneering contemporary artists, was there. So were Zhang Xiaogang, Fang Lijun, Yue Minjun, Zeng Fanzhi and 20 other well-known Chinese artists and their guests, many of whom had been flown in from Beijing to celebrate the opening of a solo exhibition of new works by Zeng Hao, another rising star in China’s bubbly art scene.

“We’ve had opening dinners before,” said the Shanghai artist Zhou Tiehai, sipping Chilean red wine, “but nothing quite like this until very recently.”

The dinner, held on a recent Saturday night in a restaurant located on the top floor of a historic building that also houses an Armani store and the Shanghai Gallery of Art, was symbolic of the soaring fortunes of Chinese contemporary art.

In 2006 Sotheby’s and Christie’s, the world’s biggest auction houses, sold $190 million worth of Asian contemporary art,

most of it Chinese, in a series of record-breaking auctions in New York, London and Hong Kong. In 2004 the two houses combined sold $22 million in Asian contemporary art.

The climax came at a Beijing auction in November when a painting by Liu Xiaodong, 43, sold to a Chinese entrepreneur for $2.7 million, the highest price ever paid for a piece by a Chinese artist who began working after 1979, when loosened economic restrictions spurred a resurgence in contemporary art.

That price put Mr. Liu in the company of the few living artists, including Damien Hirst and Jeff Koons, whose work has sold for $2 million or more at auction.

“This has come out of nowhere,” said Henry Howard-Sneyd, global head of Asian arts at Sotheby’s, which, like Christie’s, has just started a division focusing on contemporary Chinese art.

With auction prices soaring, hundreds of new studios, galleries and private art museums are opening in big cities like Beijing and Shanghai. Chinese auction houses that once specialized in traditional ink paintings are now putting contemporary experimental artworks on the block.

Western galleries, especially in Europe, are rushing to sign up unknown painters; artists a year out of college are selling photographic works for as much as $10,000 each; well-known painters have yearlong waiting lists; and the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum and the Pompidou Center in Paris are considering opening branches in China.

“What is happening in China is what happened in Europe at the beginning of the 20th century,” said Michael Goedhuis, a collector and art dealer specializing in Asian contemporary art who has galleries in London and New York. “New ground is being broken. There’s a revolution under way.”

But the auction frenzy has also sparked debate here about whether sales are artificially inflating prices and encouraging speculators, rather than real collectors, to enter the art market.

Auction houses “sell art like people sell cabbage,” said Weng Ling, the director of the Shanghai Gallery of Art. “They are not educating the public or helping artists develop. Many of them know nothing about art.”

But the boom in Chinese contemporary art — reinforced by record sales in New York last year — has also brought greater recognition to a group of experimental artists who grew up during China’s brutal Cultural Revolution (1966-1976).

After the 1989 government crackdown in Tiananmen Square, avant-garde art was often banned from being shown here because it was deemed hostile or anti-authoritarian. Through the 1990s many artists struggled to earn a living, considering themselves lucky to sell a painting for $500.

That has all changed. These days China’s leading avant-garde artists have morphed into multi-millionaires who show up at exhibitions wearing Gucci and Ferragamo.

Wang Guangyi, best-known for his Great Criticism series of Cultural Revolution-style paintings emblazoned with the names of popular Western brands, like Coke, Swatch and Gucci, drives a Jaguar and owns a 10,000-square-foot luxury villa on the outskirts of Beijing.

Yue Minjun, who makes legions of colorful smiling figures, has a walled-off suburban Beijing compound with an 8,000-square-foot home and studio. Fang Lijun, a “Cynical Realist” painter whose work captures artists’ post-Tiananmen disillusionment, owns six restaurants in Beijing and operates a small hotel in western Yunnan province.

If China’s art scene can be likened to a booming stock market, Zhang Xiaogang, 48, is its Google. More than any other Chinese artist Mr. Zhang, with his huge paintings depicting family photographs taken during the Cultural Revolution, has captured the imagination of international collectors. Prices for his work have skyrocketed at auction over the last two years.

When his work “Bloodline Series: Comrade No. 120” sold for $979,000 at Sotheby’s auction in March, many art insiders predicted the market had topped out and prices would plummet within months.

But in October, the British collector Charles Saatchi bought another of Mr. Zhang’s pieces at Christie’s in London for $1.5 million. Then in November at Christie’s Hong Kong auction, Mr. Zhang’s 1993 “Tiananmen Square” sold to a private collector for $2.3 million. According to Artnet.com, which tracks auction prices, 16 of Mr. Zhang’s works have sold for $500,000 or more during the past two years.

Are such prices justified? Uli Sigg, the former Swiss ambassador to China and perhaps the largest collector of Chinese contemporary art with more than 1,500 pieces, calls the market frothy but not finished.

“I don’t see anything at the moment that will stop the rise in prices,” he said. “More and more people are flocking to the market.”

Mr. Goedhuis insists that this is the beginning of an even bigger boom in Chinese contemporary art.

“I don’t think there’s a bubble,” he said. “There’s a lot of speculation but no bubble. That’s the paradox. In China there are only a handful of buyers — 10, 20, 30 — out of a billion people. You only need another 10 to come in and that will jack up prices.”

He added: “Another astonishing fact is there is not a single museum in the West that has committed itself to buying Chinese art. It’s just starting to happen. Guggenheim, the Tate Modern, MoMA, they’re all looking.”

Representatives from those museums, as well as others, have made scouting missions to China. A growing number of international collectors are looking at Chinese art too.

“After the 2005 Sotheby’s show I just jumped in,” said Didier Hirsch, a French-born California business executive who has long collected American and European contemporary art. “People said the next big run-up in prices would be at Sotheby’s in March so I said, ‘Now or never.’ ” Mr. Hirsch purchased nearly his entire collection — about 40 works — by phone after doing research on the Internet. He said he went first for what he called the titans — the original group of post-’79 painters — including Wang Guangyi and Liu Xiaodong.

Some critics here say the focus on prices has led to a decline in creativity as artists knock off variations of their best-known work rather than exploring new territory. Some are even employing teams of workers in assembly-line fashion.

Christopher Phillips, a curator at the International Center of Photography in New York, has become a regular visitor to China, scouting young artists for the center and other places. On a recent trip “I went to visit the studio of a well-known Beijing painter,” Mr. Phillips said. “The artist wasn’t there, but I saw a group of canvases being painted by a team of young women who seemed to be just in from the countryside. I found it a little disconcerting.”

There are also complaints that some artists are ignoring international standards by selling works directly into the auction market, rather than selling first to collectors. And many experts here say that some gallery officials and artists are sending representatives to the auctions to bid on their own works to prop up prices, or “protect” the prices of some rising stars.

But Lorenz Helbling, director of the ShanghART Gallery here, said Chinese artists continue to produce an impressive array of works, and that talk about the market being overrun by commercialism is exaggerated.

“Things are much better than they were 10 years ago,” he said. “Back then many artists were commissioned to simply paint dozens of paintings for a gallery owner, who went out and sold those works. Now these artists are thinking more deeply about their work because they’re finally getting the recognition they deserve.”