Showing posts with label ke art center. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ke art center. Show all posts

Saturday, December 13, 2008

YOKO

http://mabzchina.blogspot.com/
Unedited version of the Artforum Diary pages, which were so glossed
up. This text is tad more critical than the final version.

Over the past two months Shanghai has experienced a flurry of
international art visitors. It started when Christian Marclay and
Eliot Sharp flaunted their NY downtown grandeur at the second
incarnation of the city government run eArts Festival; then there was
Shanghart's "Involved" exhibition, in which Bern Kunshalle curator,
Philippe Pirotte was accompanied by the likes of Luc Tuymans, Knut
Åsdam and many others for the opening festivities; just last week
James Cohan Gallery presented its third exhibition in Shanghai giving
the space over to Folkert de Jong and his jolly, Styrofoam sculpted
simians, who along with his entourage from the Office for
Contemporary Art in Amsterdam, met everyone that was anyone in the
local scene during their extended stay. But nobody was more
anticipated than the crowned queen of conceptualism, Yoko Ono whose
China debut took the form of FLY, a retrospective of her
instructional works dating back to the early sixties at the, barely
two year old, Ke Center for the Contemporary Arts.

"I feel like Marco Polo must've felt when he first came to China,"
exclaimed Yoko Ono during an anecdote of her arrival at Shanghai's
hypermodern Pudong Airport last Thursday. Besides being Ono's first
exhibition in China it also Ono's first time visiting mainland China.
Ono who, like most Japanese, was raised on classic Chinese culture,
admitted that she learned her strategies for life from Sun Tze's Art
of War at the lively press conference which ended with the artist
painting her Chinese name, not on the paper prepared for it, but on
the window curtain instead.

The next day's opening was even more comic when a twenty person per
viewing rule left hundreds stampeding the artists' Ex It, 1997 wood
casket pieces, which had been installed in front of the museum's
entrance, while overhead an Ono world peace promotional video blasted
John Lennon's Give Peace a Chance through a steadily building
drizzle. In the rear of the crowd Shanghart gallery's Lorenz Hebling
and artist Zhou Tiehai shook their heads at the potentially hopeless,
rain soaked wait and opted to head off early to the dinner instead.
As the evening's drizzle developed into a downpour the museum's doors
swung open and the wet masses funneled into an already overcrowded
exhibition. "A typical Shanghai scene" joked one local standing above
the crowds on a platform built into the gallery space.

While hundreds participated in Ono's instructional pieces including
the Blue Room Event, 1966 and Wish Tree, 1996, Ono herself was
upstairs in the museum's lounge area dancing "like a chicken on acid"
as artist, Rutherford Chang observed. Her short-lived dance
performance for the masses changed to a more serious tune at the
exclusive dinner attended by a select few at the recently opened Kee
Club. This Hong Kong nightlife classic had recently been transported
to Shanghai's Dunhill mansions complex, a spectacular courtyard in
the center of the city, which besides being blessed by the presence
of Jude Law just a few weeks earlier also sports a very handsome,
very Zen, Shanghart Gallery outpost.

After dessert Ono descended to the post-dinner cocktail for one last
photo op with the locals before heading back to her hotel to sleep
off the jetlag, leaving the dwindling crowd to soak up her blessings
of universal love—and also the pouring rain.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Yoko Ono in Shanghai: Oh No, Yoko

Yoko Ono is certainly in a unique position. Ono is, of course, more famous for her love interests than her art. It's difficult for one to divorce her art from her famous marriage to John Lennon and their decade-long campaign for peace and pacifism in the 1960s and 1970s. Unique to her too is the sense of antagonism that so many feel towards her: she is, to many, the reason the Beatles broke up. Her name has become synonymous with disharmony between friends, a timeless reminder of the danger that relationships can pose to friendships.

Ono has not, however, shied away from her association with Lennon. As hundreds lined up outside the Ke Art Center to see her show "Fly" in Shanghai, a giant screen hanging against the building alternated between slideshows and videos of Ono. At one point, the video for Lennon's "Imagine" came on the screen, perhaps Lennon's most immortal songs, concluding with a written statement by Ono in which she pledges her eternal love for Lennon.

Before the doors opened, Ono stood on the roof of the center, mumbling into a poorly-balanced microphone, shining a flashlight into the crowd. Visitors were given small flashlights, and Ono declared that all should go to loved ones and strangers alike, flash light at them and declare "I love you." Ono tried tirelessly to get the crowd to chant "I love you" to each other and to her, but the crowd was disinterested and unenthusiastic. It was raining, and clearly everyone was ready to get inside to see the exhibition.

Once the doors opened, the crowd began to stampede through the double doors, creating a scary situation that, unfortunately, is not unfamiliar to crowds in Shanghai. Once I made it inside the gallery, the exhibit was, for a lack of better words, underwhelming. I suppose I set my expectations especially high because of my respect and admiration for Lennon, and, being unfamiliar with Ono's art, figured that somehow there would be a connection for me with this art. After all, this was an artist Lennon loved, and I would certainly trust his taste.

Ono's show, however, was seemingly undeveloped and hastily put together. Aside from two large posters, one of a breast and the other of a vagina, Ono's art was rather interactive, grounding itself in words and language rather than visual imagery. Visitors were encouraged on one wall to write a note of love to their mothers. The piece was me was unoriginal and uninspiring.

Ono broke up the gallery space with a makeshift stairway of sorts, a plywood mountain that visitors needed to transverse to see the rest of the show. The rest of the show consisted of a room on which Ono had written sentences and phrases on a wall in black pen, phrases that seemed intentionally ambiguous and minimal. Visitors snaked around the room, dynamically experiencing the space, but there seemed to be a lack of focus or clear message. Whereas the first part of the show seemed focus on love and maternity, this part of the show focused on more abstract concepts without a distinct thesis. Perhaps it was over my head.

I cannot say I was wholly impressed with Ono's exhibit overall. I can appreciate Ono's messages, and her undying love for Lennon, twenty-eight years after his murder, but I cannot say that I feel a connection to her art. It is, for me, far too vague.

Monday, November 24, 2008

Yoko Ono in Shanghai: war is over? not yet


Yoko Ono’s first solo show in Shanghai, “FLY” had its opening this past weekend. Many people believed they were part of an exclusive group who signed up for, or received invitations to, this opening event. To the surprise of hundreds, this was no small gathering. I arrived at the Ke Center to find a U shaped courtyard completely packed with anticipation filled visitors. Yoko Ono herself was on top of the building at the center of the U, reciting “I Love You” to corresponding blinks from a flash-light. One she retreated into the building the crowd was left waiting to be let in. At this point I had managed to work my way into the crowd to the doors of the gallery. Once people started to be let in –just a few at a time- the crowd turned into a crazy, angry mob, all pushing like crazy to try to get closer and to get in. I saw a mother holding an infant get totally knocked over, and others fall only to be trampled over. This to go see an exhibit of work done by a woman professing messages of love and peace but a moment earlier. I was part of a few lucky individuals to get into the space before EVERYONE was let in (I’m convinced that they must have stormed the doors!). Inside there was a collection of works representing different aspects and times of Yoko Ono’s career. It was interesting to see what the show would be like considering the conceptual and performance based nature of Ono’s work. In the end, the gallery was largely empty, with a few works displayed, recreated, or described. It is really hard to do justice to her art and performances without enacting them and without being in certain contexts. Messages were conveyed, and perhaps some picked up on to her ideas, but mostly people seemed to think it was a joke and pointless –they didn’t really see the meanings and intents. The largest element though was the people, the visitors. Typical of what I’ve seen in China, there was a huge crowd of people, pushing, unaware or ignoring those around them. Such disregard for humanity while fighting to see the work of a woman whose art has always been about humanity and connecting society with peace and love and understanding. While I am interested in Yoko Ono’s work and her philosophies, I don’t think they can really be represented in a static gallery setting, especially in China. Perhaps this exhibit shows how far the world still need to go to imagine all the people living life in peace.

Yoko Ono in Shanghai: Oh No! Yoko's "Fly" Hit or Miss?

I wasn't exactly sure what to expect from the opening of Yoko Ono's retrospective entitled "Fly", as I am only vaguely familiar with her in the context of her marriage to John Lennon. When I arrived at the Ke Center for Contemporary Art, I was not exactly surprised to find a video projection of some of Ono's public appearances. In them, she often spoke of things like universal love, a love that transcends the romantic or the familiar in favor of universal love for humankind. Her rhetoric on the subject I suspect has changed little since her days in the spotlight as Lennon's pacifist wife (and subsequent widow), whose connection to her is clearly inextricable. Ono's exhibition opening, despite obvious efforts on the part of the Ke Center to do otherwise, attracted hundreds of fans and caused something that could only be described as completely chaotic. The whole event, whose organization once again revealed the novice of Chinese institutions in dealing with such situations, was ironically contradictory to Ono's own philosophy and her emphasis on peace and love. Hundreds of people pushed, prodded and shoved their way to the doors of the center, which was only exacerbated by the impending downpour. Many people left in frustration. The combination of the sardine like state imposed on guests as well as the complete lack of communication between crowd and gallery staff was worthy cause for premature departure. I couldn't find one (non-security) staff member to talk to while I waited outside in the rain for an alarmingly indefinite amount of time.

Once inside, however, I am sad to say that the exhibition was not worth the struggle. The space was deceivingly large considering the amount of work that comprised the "retrospective". As far as I could tell, the work consisted of about 5 actual pieces, including the following. Most "shocking" (i.e. provocative and popular with snap-happy Chinese and tourists) were two pairs of large photographs, one a close-up of a woman's nipple, the other of a vagina. On all four photographs the words "My Mommy Is Beautiful" are inscribed.

The next snippets of work mainly consisted of Ono's scrawlings, often on the white walls of the center. To the right of the photographs was a framed poem in appreciation of motherhood. The poem lauds mothers from the perspective of the universal "child" (i.e. everyone on the earth has a mother). Not far from the poem was a large cocoon, once again evoking themes of maternity and childhood. Here the idea of "flying" was blatantly introduced; Ono compares people to butterflies and presumably, cocoons to our mothers. This symbolism was a bit heavy-handed for my taste, or maybe I simply wasn't too interested in the ideas she was expressing. I am also not so sure how deeply it resonated with the local audience, who seemed fascinated by the presence of a giant empty cocoon, but less than contemplative about its message.

There was also a room of unremarkable scrawlings and sketches, most notably a sketch of a 2000 foot long circle (which was about the size of a dumpling). I get what she was trying to do, but I wasn't awfully impressed with it. Her minimalist approach lent the works an air of laziness and incompletion, and ultimately detracted from her message. I will be interested to see how the exhibtion will be recieved.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Yoko Ono is a bad woman?

I honestly don't mind standing in the rain, or waiting in line. So although this was by far the most frustrating aspect for most visitors of the Yoko Ono Exhibition at the KE art center, it was not a problem for me. I'm not going censor myself (maybe a little), this exhibition was stupid, that ultimately was my problem. Now, after making such an absolute and judgmental comment I will to give it some justification.

Arriving at the KE art center the entire staging ground is packed with people. Everyone and their mother is here, including most of the NYU program. On the entrance of the main building is a large screen where a video on Yoko Ono's exhibition is playing. It plays once, twice, three times. Still no Yoko Onol, and no moving within the crowd. Some of the NYU start to become antsy. She shows up, and when she does the whole event is anti-climatic. You can't hear her voice, and the only thing I can barely pick up is I love Shanghai, and flash, flash flash, flash flash flash, which means I love you. I learned that from the video already, I chose not to flash her back in annoyance, and I think many of the students did the same. And then came the event we waited for, the doors opened, to only let a handful of people in. Then it rained, and we waited in the rain. As one by one people left, I stood waiting, honestly curious for what was inside. It was a full hour before I got in the building, and then 5 minutes and I was done with the exhibition. Here are my thoughts.

As so I can refrain from writing another purely negative review, I would like to focus on the positives of the show first. Production values were high, the KE art center was well refitted for the show, and all attendees were given small LED lights. I can confirm that my works a week later. The wooden coffins with plants on the outside were also a nice asthetic touch. And of course for what it's worth, Yoko Ono was there in person.

What was disappointing about the show was that it didn't seem like art. There were several posters plastered on a wall, a tree with wish tags hanging on them, and white room with minimal writing and lines on the walls. I can understand that sometimes art is different, that there may be some minimalistic ideal to it, but what Yoko Ono had to show here was not thought out, cheap, and uninspiring. I felt like drawing all over the walls just to put something there. Not to mention the theme, love. When tackling such an overplayed issue, I feel that it is important to carefully do it justice. Yoko Ono takes a legitimately interesting topic, and turns it on its ugly head. There is no semblance of thought in this exhibition. One flash, two flash, three flash is supposed to mean I love you. She takes this already absurd idea, and tries to turn it into the next phenomenon. I am not one to comply, and although I would like to spread "love" I would like to do it in a sincere and legitimate way. The self involved video segment, the ridiculous and unorderly appearance of Yoko Ono, the bare bones exhibition, and even the wait outside in the rain, all add to my disappointment to this show. Next time I will properly lower my expectations for a Yoko Ono show.

In all honestly, and reading what I have just written, this is one the most negative things I have wrote. I think it is because what she has done, does not to be symbolize legitimate art. She has taken an honest idea, and made it shallow beyond belief. I heard someone say in the crowd, why is this women making I love you so complicated? Instead of flashing some six times why not say three words, I love you? But all that aside, in this journey define art, and what art entails, this I can honestly say is not art.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Yoko Ono in Shanghai

http://shanghaichase.blogspot.com/search/label/yoko%20ono%20in%20shanghai
Reviews are all here for Yoko Ono's first Chinese solo exhibition at Shanghai's Ke Center.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Dinosuars, Violence, Dancing Buildings oh my!

Another exhibit, another hit, another "fun" experience (fun as in good)
After the initial low budget, drab, hot locations, we have finally started to arrive at the pinnacle of shanghai [commercial] art. But lets not make comparisons to the art at Comfort, or the art at Ke Art Center, we'll keep our review as positive as possible. I found that Biennial Exhibit, for all it's cash flow and uniformity, to be still full of creativity and innovation. Perhaps it is my own limited exposure to modern art but the Shanghai Biennial seems to bring the best of both worlds.

A grand building, it's a shame I didn't take any pictures of the entrance, or the outside of the building. On the outside you are greeted by two of the largest pieces of artwork in the exhibit. Multicolored massive ants crawling up the wall of the exhibition, and a large rusting antique train. It sends a clear message, the theme is translocomotion, and that this is a legitimate art exhibit. Not a lot of subtly, it's an eye catcher through and through.

And perhaps reflecting on our experience, the Shanghai Biennial is a people magnet because that is it's purpose. Similar to a national history museum, or a science museum they are as much there to educate and display information as to entertain. The question is then, does big budget, big pockets, and ultimately ulterior motives distort the art?

No, I don't think so, or at least not yet. The following are several superb pieces that I feel display both theme (an old theme granted) and display ingenuity.
Aptly named Colorful Running Dinosaurs, these pieces definitely fit the bill for entertainment. Lots of Asian tourists (me included) are ogling at the beasts, posing in front and making peace signs or another cute gesture to take pictures. The dino-men are simply a wonder to look at in terms of size, color, and number. I wanted to take a picture in front the dinosaur, but alas I was too embarrassed. But it's really ironic that people would smile and take a picture with the hulking beasts. Their smiles, laughing faces are send a sad message to me. More then the circus or automobiles, this exhibit reminds me of lemmings, of to the slaughter. The people that are taking pictures, forced to stand close because of the width of the hall, seem also to be dumbfound, smiling away. Translocomotion, all lined up ready to go meet or extinction, happily doing it all the while. Yue MinJun, the creator of this exhibit, manges to deliver his subtle message in this audacious piece of art.Next is the also aptly named violent cartoon Savage Growth. It reminds me of the Itchy and Scratchy show, except not funny. As part of the attention-less, ADD generation (ironic translocomotion?) I have always had a soft heart for moving pictures. That said I am not usually a fan of the movie style pieces. They are in my personal opinion unprofessional, boring, and displayed poorly. Savage Growth was most definitely displayed poorly, in a dark little corner, with a single seat in the middle of the room with a mid-quality projector. But even as I was walking by, I couldn't help myself, I peeked in. The music, the artwork, and the engrossing violence all capture me, sink line and hook. Michelle my partner, seems sort of antsy, and leaves prematurely (a difference in taste), but I there to stay, eyes glued to the screen. I watch the entire sequence two times through. This piece is glaringly obvious in it's message. Two headless persons representing nations building weapons, urbanizing, competing in every fashion. Planes clash, and workers mechanically pave the foundation for gigantic high-rises. Like red lettering on the wall it's message is loud and clear, and it's bold rough strokes, and violent animation depict those red characters to the letter. Urbanization can one day be the death of us. The enemy of my enemy is ambition.

As usual, we save the best for last, and as for the my theme of creatively entertaining this most certainly fits the bill.
It's not pretty, it color choice is sort of drab. It's not "important", it's located at the wing of the exhibit. But it is fun to play with. I walk in to the semi-circular room. Wait... Why are the walls moving. Like the "slow" person I am, I don't get it... I see others in the exhibit moving up and down and think, weird, but nothing strikes me as odd about the exhibit. It seems like another prerecorded video, blah. But to my surprise, Michelle, who has been putting up with me this entire time, explains the exhibit to me. If you dance, the pictures dance with you. (above) So that's me, in building form. But again, this isn't just entertainment, isn't just Hollywood. This is the Biennial, an art exhibition at it's heart. And this exhibit I feel has the modern, most relevant message of all. Called Shanghai, shall we dance?, this piece reflects the growing involvement of the population in urbanization. Increasingly, Chinese people, Shanghainese are supporting and resisting change in the city. With three images in total, together the Chinese will shape their own future. It's a complex message delivered in a simple manner that is almost instantaneously understood (for me slightly slower).

And on that positive note, China, modern art in Shanghai, urbanization is all on the rise, whether for the good or for the bad, this exhibit has shown that they/we are in it together. My verdict? The Biennial is not Hollywood, and that's a good thing, but it's just nearly as entertaining.
Oh, and this is my museum partner Michelle, whom put up with me, and whose pictures I stole! Thank you Michelle.

Saturday, October 04, 2008

The Chinese Art Explosion

The Chinese Art Explosion

As works by Chinese artists fetch multimillion-dollar prices, the
international art world is waking to the power of the Asian market.
China has spawned hundreds of new galleries, 1,600 auction houses,
art fairs, and growing numbers of contemporary-art collectors, while
accusations surface that some are engaging in widespread speculation
by Barbara Pollack

The market for Chinese contemporary art has developed at a feverish
pace, becoming the single fastest-growing segment of the
international art market. Since 2004, prices for works by Chinese
contemporary artists have increased by 2,000 percent or more, with
paintings that once sold for under $50,000 now bringing sums above $1
million. Nowhere has this boom been felt more appreciably than in
China, where it has spawned massive gallery districts, 1,600 auction
houses, and the first generation of Chinese contemporary-art collectors.

This craze for Chinese contemporary art has also given rise to a wave
of criticism. There are charges that Chinese collectors are using
mainland auction houses to boost prices and engage in widespread
speculation, just as if they were trading in stocks or real estate.
Western collectors are also being accused of speculation, by artists
who say they buy works cheap and then sell them for ten times the
original prices—and sometimes more.

Those who entered this market in the past three years found Chinese
contemporary art to be a surefire bet as prices doubled with each
sale. Sotheby's first New York sale of Asian contemporary art,
dominated by Chinese artists, brought a total of $13 million in March
2006; the same sale this past March garnered $23 million, and
Sotheby's Hong Kong sale of Chinese contemporary art in April totaled
nearly $34 million. Christie's Hong Kong has had sales of Asian
contemporary art since 2004. Its 2005 sales total of $11 million was
dwarfed by the $40.7 million total from a single evening sale in May
of this year.

These figures, impressive as they are, do not begin to convey the
astounding success at auction of a handful of Chinese artists: Zhang
Xiaogang, Yue Minjun, Cai Guo-Qiang, Liu Xiaodong, and Liu Ye. The
leader this year was Zeng Fanzhi, whose Mask Series No. 6 (1996) sold
for $9.6 million, a record for Chinese contemporary art, at
Christie's Hong Kong in May.

Zhang Xiaogang, who paints large, morose faces reminiscent of family
photographs taken during the Cultural Revolution, has seen his record
rise from $76,000 in 2003, when his oil paintings first appeared at
Christie's Hong Kong, to $2.3 million in November 2006, to $6.1
million in April of this year.

Gunpowder drawings by Cai Guo-Qiang, who was recently given a
retrospective at the Guggenheim Museum in New York, sold for well
below $500,000 in 2006; a suite of 14 works brought $9.5 million last
November.

According to the Art Price Index, Chinese artists took 35 of the top
100 prices for living contemporary artists at auction last year,
rivaling Jeff Koons, Damien Hirst, and a host of Western artists.

"Everybody is looking to the East and to China, and the art market
isn't any different," says Kevin Ching, CEO of Sotheby's Asia.
"Notwithstanding the subprime crisis in the U.S. or the fact that
some of the other financial markets seem jittery, the overall
business community still has great faith in China, bolstered by the
Olympics and the World Expo in Shanghai in 2010."

There are indications, however, that the international market for
Chinese art is beginning to slow. At Sotheby's Asian contemporary-art
sale in March, 20 percent of the lots offered found no buyers, and
even works by top record-setters such as Zhang Xiaogang barely made
their low estimates. "The market is getting mature, so we can't sell
everything anymore," says Xiaoming Zhang, Chinese contemporary-art
specialist at Sotheby's New York. "The collectors have become really
smart and only concentrate on certain artists, certain periods,
certain material."

For their part, Western galleries are eagerly pursuing Chinese
artists, many of whom were unknown just a few years ago. Zeng Fanzhi,
for example, has been signed by Acquavella Galleries in New York, in
a two-year deal that exceeds $20 million, according to a Beijing
gallerist close to the negotiations; William Acquavella declined to
comment. Zhang Xiaogang and Zhang Huan have joined PaceWildenstein,
and Ai Weiwei and Liu Xiaodong showed with Mary Boone last spring.
Almost every major New York gallery has recently signed on a Chinese
artist: Yan Pei Ming at David Zwirner, Xu Zhen at James Cohan, Huang
Yong Ping at Gladstone, Yang Fudong at Marian Goodman, Liu Ye at
Sperone Westwater. Their works are entering private and public
collections that until now have not shown any particular interest in
Asian contemporary art.

"The market hasn't behaved as I anticipated," says New York dealer
Max Protetch, who has been representing artists from China since
1996. "We all anticipated that the Chinese artists would go through
the same critical process that happens with art anywhere else in the
world. I assumed that some artists would fall by the wayside, which
has not been true. They all have become elevated. It seems like an
uncritical market."

One of the key artists buoyed by this success is Zeng Fanzhi, who is
best known for his "Mask" series. Five years ago his works sold for
under $50,000. Today he commands prices on the primary market closer
to $1 million, with major collectors Charles Saatchi and Jose Mugrabi
among his fans. Now preparing for his first solo show at Acquavella
in December, he is considered one of the more serious artists on the
Beijing scene because he works alone, without the horde of assistants
found in most other artists' studios in China. Still, his lifestyle
is typical of that of his equally successful peers. When asked if he
owns a mammoth black Hummer parked outside his studio, he answers,
"No, that's an ugly car. I have a G5 Benz."

This success has blossomed under the watchful eye of the Chinese
government. Movies, television, and news organizations are strictly
censored, but on the whole, the visual arts are not. Despite sporadic
incidents of exhibitions being closed or customs officials seizing
artworks, by and large the government has supported the growth of an
art market and has not interfered with private activity. In the 798
gallery district in Beijing, a Bauhaus-style former munitions complex
that has been transformed into the capital's hottest art center, with
more than 150 galleries, one finds works addressing poverty and other
social problems, official corruption, and new sexual mores. The icons
of the former China—happy workers and peasants and heroic soldiers
raising the red banner—are treated with irony, if at all, by the
artists whose works are on view in these galleries, which are private
venues generally not under the strict control of the Ministry of
Culture.

On the eve of the Olympics, however, the government asked one gallery
to postpone an exhibition until after the games. Considered
unsuitable was "Touch," a show by Ma Baozhong at the Xin Beijing
Gallery of 15 paintings depicting important moments in Chinese
history, including one based on a photograph showing Mao Zedong with
the Dalai Lama and the Panchen Lama in 1954.

The Beijing municipality spent enormous funds to renovate the 798
district before the Olympics, putting in new cobblestone streets and
lining its main thoroughfare with cafés. Shanghai, which has
benefited less from government support, now boasts at least 100
galleries. Local governments throughout the country are establishing
SoHo-style gallery districts to boost tourism.

One person who seems confident about the future of the Chinese market
is Arne Glimcher, founder and president of PaceWildenstein, who
opened a branch of his gallery in Beijing in August. Located in a
22,000-square-foot cement space with soaring ceilings, redesigned at
a cost of $20 million by architect Richard Gluckman, the gallery is
in the center of the 798 district. "We are committed to the art, and
we wanted to open a gallery where our artists are," says Glimcher.
Adding that he normally eschews the "McGallery" trend of setting up
satellite spaces around the world, Glimcher insists that it was
necessary to establish a branch in Beijing because there is "no local
gallery of our caliber" with which Pace could partner. He has,
however, recruited Leng Lin, founder of Beijing Commune, another
gallery operating in 798, to be his director.

Another Western dealer who has taken the China plunge is Arthur
Solway, who recently opened a branch of James Cohan in Shanghai. "I
started coming to China five years ago, and I was fascinated by the
energy," says Solway, who wanted to introduce gallery artists like
Bill Viola, Wim Wenders, and Roxy Paine to Asia but, like Glimcher,
could not find a public museum or private gallery that he considered
professionally qualified to handle such exhibitions. James Cohan
Gallery Shanghai is located on the ground floor of a 1936 Art Deco
structure in the French Concession, a particularly picturesque
section of the city. The building was once occupied by the military,
and red Chinese characters over the front door still exhort, "Let the
spirit of Mao Zedong flourish for 10,000 years."

"From 1966 to 1976, during the Cultural Revolution, people had
nothing, but now there are spas in Shanghai and people drinking
cappuccinos and buying Rolex watches—it's an amazing phenomenon,"
says Solway, who believes it is only a matter of time before these
same newly affluent consumers begin to collect contemporary art.

Chinese collectors—or the hope that there will be Chinese collectors—
are the key draw luring these galleries to Beijing. As recently as
two years ago, few could name even a single Chinese collector of
contemporary art. It was a truism that the Chinese preferred to spend
their money acquiring antiquities and classical works. Since then
several well-known mainland collectors have emerged on the scene.

Most visible is Guan Yi, the suave, well-dressed heir to a chemical-
engineering fortune, who has assembled a museum-quality collection of
more than 500 works. A major lender to the Huang Yong Ping
retrospective organized by the Walker Art Center in Minneapolis in
2005, he regularly entertains museum trustees from all over the
world, who make the pilgrimage to his warehouse on the outskirts of
Beijing. Now he is building his own museum.

Another noted figure is Zhang Lan, head of the South Beauty chain of
Szechuan-style restaurants throughout China; she also has assembled
an enviable collection and displays pieces from it in her chic
establishments. The film actress Zhang Ziyi is representative of a
new class of collectors from the entertainment industry, while Pan
Shiyi and Zhang Xin, chairman and CEO of the mammoth SOHO China real
estate empire, have commissioned projects for their upscale
residential properties.

Two collectors who are cheerleaders for the Beijing art scene are
Yang Bin, an automobile-franchise mogul, and Zhang Rui, a
telecommunications executive who is also the backer of Beijing Art
Now Gallery, which took part in Art Basel in June, one of the first
Beijing galleries to appear at the fair. These two do more than
collect art. They have hosted dinners for potential collectors,
organized tours to Art Basel Miami Beach, and brought friends with
them to sales in London and New York. Zhang Rui, who owns more than
500 works, has lent art to international exhibitions, most notably
the installation Tomorrow, which features four "dead Beatles"
mannequins floating facedown, created by artists Sun Yuan and Peng Yu
for the 2006 Liverpool Biennial, which rejected it.

Zhang is now building an art hotel, featuring specially commissioned
works and artist-designed rooms, outside the Workers' Stadium in the
center of Beijing. "I am trying to think of ways of changing my
private collection into a public collection," Zhang explained to
ARTnews through a translator. It isn't financially advantageous to do
this in China, as no tax benefits accrue from donations to museums or
other nonprofit institutions.

Zhang Rui represents the handful of Chinese collectors who are public
about their activities and are building noteworthy collections. Far
more typical of buying activity in China is the rampant speculation
taking place in the mainland auction houses. There are 1,600
registered auctioneers, and their sales attract hundreds of bidders.
Chinese buyers are more comfortable with auction houses, which have
been in business since 1994, than with galleries, which weren't
licensed to operate by the government until the late 1990s.

These auction houses run by their own rules, generating what
sometimes seems like a "wild, wild East" atmosphere. It is, for
example, fairly common for a house to get consignments directly from
artists, who then use the sales to establish prices for their works
on the primary market. More often, now that China has hundreds of
galleries, dealers come to a sale with buyers in tow, publicly
bidding up works to establish "record prices" and advertise their
artists. This kind of bidding ring would be considered illegal in the
United States, but in China it is viewed as a savvy business
practice. There is little regulation of auction houses and few
developed legal norms in the field, so that even when buyers have
grievances—with fakes and forgeries, for example—they do not feel
they can resort to the law. Bidding is a social as well as a business
activity, and buyers are happy to flaunt their status by paying
record prices or quickly flipping artworks, not only for profit but
so they can boast of their short-term gains.

As the domestic market for contemporary art matures, however, many of
these practices are coming into question. "Two years ago it was more
necessary for me to bring my artists to auction," says Fang Fang,
owner of Star Gallery in Beijing, which specializes in young emerging
artists such as Chen Ke and Gao Yu. "Now that the gallery market has
increased, I find it is better to keep my artists out of the auction
rooms, and there is much less reason to sell there."

Two mainland firms, Beijing Poly International Auction Company, and
China Guardian Auctions Company, dominate the field of contemporary
Chinese art. Their combined 2007 total of more than $200 million in
sales represented nearly two-thirds of all auction sales in this
category in mainland China for the year. Last spring Guardian
achieved $142 million in sales of classical artworks, furniture,
ceramics, silver, and coins, and $40 million in sales of contemporary
material. The latter figure included the $8.2 million fetched by Liu
Xiaodong's Hotbed No. 1, a record for a painting sold on the
mainland. In a similar range of sales last spring, Poly sold $130
million worth of works, including $27 million in a single evening
contemporary-art sale. (These figures represent a slight decline for
the year because both houses held benefit sales for Szechuan
earthquake victims, raising more than $20 million to support relief
efforts.)

Poly and Guardian reflect two vastly different perspectives on the
domestic market in Chinese contemporary art. Guardian is the oldest
and most respected auction house in China, founded in 1993 by Wang
Yannan, daughter of Zhao Ziyang, the former Communist Party leader
who was placed under house arrest after opposing the government's use
of force against demonstrators at Tiananmen Square in 1989. If Poly
is known for its vast resources and willingness to make deals to nab
consignments, Guardian is known for its respected specialists and
long-term client relationships. For example, when the Museum of Fine
Arts, Boston, decided to sell 20 pieces of Qing dynasty porcelain in
mainland China, it consigned the collection to Guardian.

The atmosphere of a sale at Poly or Guardian is surprisingly similar
to that in the salerooms of Christie's or Sotheby's. The catalogues
are identical in design, and the bidding proceeds in an orderly, even
sedate, fashion, despite the crowds of spectators in the room.

"From our beginning, we studied what the principles of an auction
house should be, and we stick to these principles," says Guardian
president Wang. She also serves on the board of the new nationwide
auctioneers' association, which hopes to enforce regulations on the
auction market.

Poly is an enterprise within the China Poly Group Corporation, a $30
billion conglomerate that is the privatized branch of the People's
Liberation Army. Established initially to repatriate artworks and
antiquities, Poly has spent $100 million buying objects such as the
bronze animal heads from a water-clock fountain that were looted from
Beijing's Summer Palace by British and French troops in 1860; the
pieces later turned up in the West. The repatriated objects are
showcased in the Poly Art Museum in the sparkling New Beijing Poly
Plaza, a glass-enclosed tower designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill.

The more freewheeling Poly is known for practices such as putting up
for auction works from its own collection or having consignors
guarantee that they will bring buyers to the sale to meet low
estimates. Still, even here there are signs that the market is
maturing and has become too expensive for casual speculators. "These
collectors that you are talking about are actually quite small
collectors," explains Zhao Xu, senior consultant at Poly. "They
bought for several years at very affordable prices, but now that
prices are skyrocketing, the only way they can afford to buy is to
sell. The collectors that I know already come from a high social
status, and they can afford to buy pieces worth $1 million or $2
million and are looking for the best works, the masterpieces, to add
to their collections."

When asked if Poly follows the rules of the Western auction houses,
Zhao sharply retorts, "Sometimes even Sotheby's doesn't follow the
rules." Or as Gong Jisui, an art-market specialist who is a professor
at the Central Academy of Fine Arts in Beijing, says, "The Chinese
learned this game of speculation from the Westerners who played it
first."

The incident to which both men are referring is the sale of the
Estella Collection at Sotheby's Hong Kong on April 9 of this year.
The event reaped $18 million for 108 works. (An additional 80 works
will be up for sale this month at Sotheby's New York.) The collection
was put together from 2003 to 2006 by New York dealer Michael
Goedhuis for a group of investors that included Sacha Lainovic, a
director of Weight Watchers International, and Raymond Debbane, CEO
of the Invus Group, a private equity firm.

Last year the collection of approximately 200 works was sold to
William Acquavella, who consigned it to Sotheby's. Auction house
officials will not discuss financial details, but Sotheby's had a
stake in the collection. After the sale it was widely reported that
many of the artists were angered by the auction because, they said,
they had sold their works to Goedhuis at discount prices in exchange
for promises that the collection would remain together for public
display.

"The idea was to keep the collection intact and to see it safely into
some institution," says Goedhuis, who denies that any promises were
made. "The ideal situation was to see it with an institution in
China, because there is no such collection." The collection was
published in a book, China Onward, with an essay by leading China
expert Britta Erickson, and it was exhibited at the Louisiana Museum
of Modern Art in Denmark and the Israel Museum in Jerusalem shortly
before the sale. According to Goedhuis, because of the rapid rise in
prices, the investors chose to sell the collection with hopes that it
would not be broken up.

"Since the museums in China aren't mature enough nor are they rich
enough to do an acquisition like this, my hope was that Steve Wynn
would do so for his sophisticated casino complex in Macao," Goedhuis
says. He turned to Acquavella because, he says, he believed the
dealer would bring the collection to Wynn; Acquavella paid a reported
$25 million. Acquavella director Michael Findlay laughs at the
suggestion that there was any indication that the collection would go
to Wynn. "I think this whole thing is surrounded by so much rumor and
speculation," he says. "We bought a group of paintings, and we sold a
group of paintings, and that's the whole story."

According to Maarten ten Holder, Sotheby's managing director for
North and South America, the firm received inquiries before the sale
from several artists in the collection, wondering why the works were
to be auctioned. There is disagreement about whether Goedhuis made
firm promises to keep the collection together or merely made a sales
pitch to artists that inclusion in the collection would enhance their
reputations. Yue Minjun, who had two works in the sale, says no
promises were made. And Goedhuis bought Zeng Fanzhi's Chairman Mao
with Us from Hanart T Z Gallery in 2005 for the asking price,
$30,000, no discount given. It sold for $1.18 million.

"You have to understand that there was no market for this work when I
was buying," says Howard Farber, whose collection brought $20 million
at Phillips de Pury & Company in London last October. Farber
assembled 100 choice works by assiduously visiting artists' studios
in Beijing in the late 1980s, accompanied by the Beijing-based critic
Karen Smith, a leading author and curator in this field. A work for
which he paid $25,000 in 1996, Wang Guangyi's Great Criticism: Coca-
Cola, was sold at Phillips de Pury for $1.6 million. The buyer was
Farber's son-in-law, Larry Warsh, who bid on several works at the
sale, according to newspaper accounts. "I really didn't actually know
I was going to buy the Wang Guangyi until that moment," says Warsh.
"Howard has his collection, and it's not my collection, and there
were many pieces I wanted from that collection that I would have
wanted to buy but couldn't afford."

Many Beijing artists had agreements with Warsh to produce work for
his collection and his art advisory business, which began in 2004,
inspired by Farber's example in the field. "I was enamored by China,
and then I was enamored by the art of China as I learned about
important artists," says Warsh. "But what really hit me first was how
the pricing did not make sense to me at all—everything was out of
whack."

Warsh, who amassed a collection of works by Jean-Michel Basquiat,
Keith Haring, and Kenny Scharf in the late 1980s, was the publisher
of the now-defunct Museums Magazine, which he sold to LTB Media in
2004. He stated at one point that his collection totaled more than
1,200 works; now, he says, he owns approximately 400 paintings and
photographs. Part of his collection is managed by his new business
venture, AW Asia, which has a gallery in Chelsea and intends to
assemble collections of Chinese contemporary art for museums and
major private collectors. The Museum of Modern Art in New York
recently acquired 23 photographs from AW Asia.

With Farber and Warsh circulating in Beijing for a variety of
purposes, it was easy for Chinese artists to become confused about
who was buying for whom and for what purpose. In recent interviews,
several artists—most notably Zhang Xiaogang, who had an agreement
with Warsh—pointed to him as an example of a speculator.

Warsh replies, "While some artists are not so pleased with their
decision to have sold quantities of artwork at what was then their
current values not so long ago, there are many artists who are not
resentful and actually pleased that someone has taken an interest in
their work."

New York dealer Jack Tilton, who has worked with Chinese artists
since 1999, says, "All of these artists are hoping that their work
finds good homes rather than getting churned in the commercial
market. But they have also played a part in this market, embracing
capitalism more than we have, in funny ways. They are not naive about
any of this stuff."

When asked about the artists' reactions to the sale of his
collection, Farber was flabbergasted: "So what? Now I am the bad guy.
That pisses me off!"

A number of major collectors of Chinese contemporary art who have
been in the field for some time are holding on to their collections.
Uli Sigg, Swiss ambassador to China, Mongolia, and North Korea from
1995 to 1998, has built a collection of key works that he has toured
in the exhibition "Mahjong" to museums throughout Europe and, most
recently, the University of California's Berkeley Art Museum
(September 10–January 4). Belgian collectors Guy and Myriam Ullens
have used their resources to establish the first nonprofit
contemporary-art center in Beijing, where they are currently
exhibiting their historic collection. So far, collector Charles
Saatchi has been hanging on to his purchases in preparation for
opening his new gallery in London on the 9th of next month with a
show of Chinese contemporary art; he has also launched a Chinese-
language Web site on which mainland artists can post their works.

In comparison with Western buying, mainland Chinese participation
pales. Though there are many rumors about the power of the new
Chinese buyers, their presence has not been felt in the major auction
houses, where most of the records are being set. "Hong Kong right now
covers the global buyers, especially those from across Asia," says
Eric Chang, Christie's international director of Asian contemporary
art. "I am not really seeing mainland Chinese buyers—less than 10
percent—a drop from around 12 percent." Dealers in China also have
seen few mainland collectors among their regular clients. "I don't
know yet about collectors," says New York dealer Christophe Mao of
Chambers Fine Art, which recently opened a branch in Beijing.

Despite the current shortage of mainland art collectors, China is
emerging as a major art center, having become a hub for buyers from
South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Indonesia, and Southeast Asia, and
for overseas Chinese from all over the world. Reflecting this
diversity is the wide range of foreign dealers among the 300
galleries in Beijing, including Continua from Italy, Urs Meile from
Switzerland, Arario and PKM from South Korea, Beijing Tokyo Art
Projects from Japan, and Tang from Indonesia.

"In Beijing it's getting increasingly difficult to talk about the
Chinese market as a separate entity from the broader Asian art market
or the international art market," says Meg Maggio, an American who
came to China in 1988 and ran one of the first galleries in the
country, CourtYard, in Beijing, from 1998 to 2006. Now she has her
own gallery, Pékin Fine Arts, where she represents an international
stable of artists. "How do you describe the market for a Korean
artist showing in China or a Chinese artist living in New York?" she
asks, noting that her business can come from South Korean collectors
visiting Beijing or European companies doing business in China.

One factor in China's development as a center for contemporary art is
the proliferation of art fairs. Beijing has two, the China
International Gallery Exposition and Art Beijing; Shanghai has the
newly created ShContemporary, now in its second year; and Hong Kong
just launched ART HK. CIGE director Wang Yihan says her fair
attracted 40,000 visitors this year, while the more high-toned
ShContemporary brought in 25,000 and ART HK 08 had 19,000. These
numbers may seem small in comparison with the 60,000 who crowd Art
Basel, but dealers believe that the fairs in Asia are worthwhile
because they attract new buyers and make Asian collectors feel more
comfortable about acquiring art from galleries.

"Anywhere else, a fair is just a fair," says Lorenz Helbling of
ShanghART, one of the oldest galleries in China and a participant in
Art Basel. "But in Shanghai a fair feels like so much more because
only there can it make an impact on several million people." He is
referring not only to attendance but to the intensive publicity and
official recognition given to ShContemporary in its inaugural year.

Just a few years ago it would have been impossible to try to sell
contemporary art to Asian buyers, let alone mainland Chinese
collectors, in the public forum of an art fair. Now, with the
astounding success of Chinese contemporary art, collectors from
across the region—and more than a few from the United States and
Europe—are targeting China as a destination. According to Nick
Simunovic, who has opened an office and showroom for Gagosian Gallery
in Hong Kong, it is only a matter of time before these regional
buyers turn their attention to Western contemporary art.

"My sense is that wherever you have tremendous wealth creation, the
collecting cycle goes through three phases," he says. "First, people
collect their cultural patrimony, and then they collect their own
contemporary art. I think the final stage is when they gain a more
globalized contemporary-art approach."

Gagosian first considered opening an office in Shanghai but
encountered obstacles to doing business on the mainland. The most
formidable of these is a 34 percent luxury tax on art, which foreign
galleries that participated in ShContemporary found difficult to
avoid. Hong Kong, by comparison, is a duty-free zone. And Simunovic
found that even Jeff Koons was a tough sell in Shanghai, whereas Hong
Kong offers more possibilities for Western contemporary art. Just a
year ago Hong Kong billionaire Joseph Lau paid $72 million for Andy
Warhol's Green Car Crash (Green Burning Car I). In May Christie's
brought a Warhol portrait of Mao, valued at $120 million and for sale
privately, for viewing in Hong Kong. (At press time it had not yet
been sold.)

"Sure, China is hot, but that's just the peak of the iceberg," says
Lorenzo Rudolf, former director of Art Basel and cofounder of
ShContemporary. "This is not just about a group of Chinese painters.
It's about a growing market going on in this continent."

With the sheer abundance of galleries, auction houses, and art fairs
in China, the larger art world is recognizing the power of the Asian
market. Standing in an auction house in New York or London watching
paintings by Chinese artists sell for millions, one can grouse about
this boom and hint that it will turn out to be a bubble. But
strolling in a bustling gallery district in Beijing, with students
and tourists crowding the cafés and boutiques and filling the huge
art showrooms, few would predict a downturn in the near future.

Barbara Pollack is a contributing editor of ARTnews.


Order This Issue | Subscribe to ARTnews
< Back to September 2008
Home Advertise Links Customer Service Privacy Policy Terms of Use
Contact Us
© 2008 ARTnews LLC. All Rights Reserved. Website by Analog Method.
ARTnews® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

"Ke ai de" Creepy Corner

Like the Comfort Exhibit, the Ke Art Center is hot too, except without the ackwardly ironic name(to add to the problem I walked to the center from the apartment: leave the rest to imagination). But I'm by myself so hygiene can take a back seat to my appretiation of art.
First a brief tour of the facilities...
You're greeted by this thing:


Sort of funny no? Reminds me of an eardrum, maybe to symbolize a listening attitude, but I'm just throwing out random guesses.
Next turn left and you are greated by:
Floating brains perhaps? Next to these floating hardhat brains is a projected video of man randomly riding on his bike wearing one these hardhat brains. The process of coming of up with an idea can be random, but dangerous as well (that seems to be the theme of this particular exhibit, science and it's dangers) And how can I miss everyones favorite "evolution exhibit made out of pencil shavings.This one is sort of funny, science is like doodling, kiddy, creative and silly. Val, Hanah, and Michelle have spent good time on this piece. I concur with their opinions.
The next two rooms are one of political intrigue and social unrest (pictures of protests and arrests etc. and graffiti and a curved wall). And that's it, another small exhibit to be sure... unless you venture up stairs.

What truly caught my attention was something I happened to stumble upon.
What's the name of the piece, who painted it? I have not clue. I did not stay long enough to find out, but perhaps that in itself is testament to how engrossing the atmosphere it created was. It's really creepy. Much like how The Ring, or the Grudge (horror movies) will use little children to unnerve their audience, so does this exhibit. Image dead babies that stair at you (I think the heat was getting to my head). The dimly lit stairwell obscures your vision and forces you to take a closer look at the circular paintings on the wall. A closer look rewards you a pair of pentrating eyes, and a child or creature with its head titled foward, ready to slowly crawl out of its window. There's no one around, and the swelting heat just suddenly became stiffling. What results is a brilliant (accidentital?) exhibit that plays with your emotions and proceeds to give them a give twist. I stood there for a minute at most, took a picture and left, but serveral seconds in front of a couple of creepy babies was the highlight and lowlight of my ke art excersion.

Still sweating, from I don't know, I left in hurry. Down the steps around the the other exhibits, and past that ackward eardrum. On my walk back to the apartment I had plenty to think about, and I decided that I might forget the brains, or the pencil shavings, or the graffiti, but I must pray,
Ke ai the baby, please don't haunt me

In my book, that's a good exhibit and good fun

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Art through Photographs




Today I explored the Ke Art Center, consisting of photograph work from Vietnamese and Cambodian artists. As I walked in, the non-air conditioned room took my mind away for about one second before I laid my eyes on this work of art by Chan Dany entitled “Evolution.”



The first thing that caught my eye were the colored pencils along the bottom of the piece. On top of each pencil was a picture that represented the evolution of mankind, from dinosaur to high-rise buildings to sleek sports automobiles. At first glance, it seemed like a simple piece, almost like a child had colored in his coloring book. However, once I looked up I discovered the intricate picture he had placed together with shavings from the color pencils displayed below. The complex picture on top of a fish and flowers with clouds in the background was a stark contrast with the simple pictures on the bottom. I really enjoyed this piece because it seemed like it was a fusion between the East and West because the pieces on top seem oriental to me, almost as if it was a picture taken off the wall of an Asian restaurant. It seems like the process of placing each piece of shaving seemed extremely tedious. The top portion looks as if it is in constant motion. The fish, which lies below the water, and the lotus flower, which usually lies above the water, fits in with the blue shavings that to me represents the always moving water. The always in motion picture on top is in sync with the ever changing mode of evolution placed on the bottom.




The second piece of artwork that caught my eye was the self portrait of Vietnamese artist Truong Tan. Called the “Artist’s Portrait.” The artwork is very simple, and drawn with only three colors. He portrays himself with bloody tears and a knife pointed at himself. His face is drawn without a mouth, showing his silence. Rather than speaking of his internal issues, he expresses his feelings in his art. In his torso there are four additional bodies, which look like himself. However, the bodies are blood red and lined with spots, indicating that he is in pain inside. Three of the four bodies are attacking one of them, literally eating him alive. However, only one of the three are actually physically biting the 4th body, which makes it seem as if inside his mind he is conflicted with multiple personalities, some more intense than others. The artist seems distraught with a lot of rage that is tearing himself apart. There seems to be some sort of sexual connotation within the piece, but I am not sure what exactly it is.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

A Bittersweet Taste of Vietnam & Cambodia






Some classmates and I went to the Ke Center for the Contemporary Arts' Cambodia and Vietnam Exhibition called "Strategies from Within." We walked into a cozy little exhibition with very few but quality art works. I thought it was very unique how there were small exhibition rooms within exhibition rooms and if you turn around, one would encounter exhibition spaces hidden on the sides too. This random set-up collaborated smoothly with the miscellaneous pieces of eclectic artworks.

Despite the language barrier and my unfamiliarity with the Cambodian and Vietname way of life and culture, I was astounded by the screaming emotions and meanings that touched me. That is my favorite part of art; art has no language. In fact, art itself is a common language that seems to connect the world together.

I loved today's exhibition so much, because I encountered upon an artist and his artwork that spoke to me the most out of any art works I have seen here. The artist's name is Truong Tan. His four artworks were hung side by side, and as soon as I saw them, I immediately could feel his emotions. Anger, pain, ad bitterness screamed out of each and every one of those pieces. The colors itself spoke better than words. His use of red and black especially. My favorite out of the four pieces was called Artist's Portrait (below).
There are so many things that can be said about this painting. I think it spoke to me more because this was his self-portrait. The bleeding red tears especially got to me. If tears signify sadness, tears of blood signifies excruciating heartache. Almost like an open wound that won't stop gushing. The knife stabs right at his heart. It exemplifies what all humans feel when going through intense heartbreak and sadness. No wonder people seem to always express: "I feel like I just got my heart ripped out," or "I feel like I just got stabbed in the heart." What was most interesting were the humans inside him drawn in red. You can't see very clearly from the photo, but the three figures rolling around in different positions with grin-like expressions seem to represent the antagonists who are taunting and harassing the artist. The one standing up representing the artist who is throwing his arms up in mercy. It was also interesting how the knife was right above these figures trapped inside him, because it seemed to signify the hatred and angst towards the cause of the pain as well as towards himself for feeling so. The gray colored body also expressed so much--darkness signifying gloominess, depression, and death. This portrait screamed the loudest.

The other three artworks by this artist as you can see below yell out so much angst as well.
I was astounded by the acute communication of emotions that Truong Tan was able to achieve through his artworks.
Title: I Piss on All of You
Title: You Are Not Good as People, Think You Will Die


Title: Baby He is Not Yours

Spray it, Don't Say it



The Ke Center was almost a repeat scare of when we went to Nanjing Museum because we had a little difficulty finding its location. Fortunately we found the center and we found the art. The exhibit was great (and free). I highly recommend going. Its not far at all either. A lot of art pieces caught my eye but the ones I'd like to focus are the three I posted. The first one above is by Leang Seckon, called "Country Boy-City Boy." This one really interested me because of the contrasting pictures. Based on the title of the art, I found that the two really of are two different things. The left side showed innocence because of the child, yet ignorance because of the cigarette box. There is so much less detail (minus the sewed notebook) compared the city boy because the city boy, I feel, experiences more in life, meaning mainly that a city boy may learn from their mistakes because of experience. This picture hit me because I feel that I can relate to the both the country life and city life coming from my background. I feel that the country life shows innoncence and lack of experience while the city life shows maturity, adventure, and mainly just experience. It just shows great opposites between the two.




The one above is by Chan Dany, called "Evolution." I like this one mainly because of its message-evolution and wasting away our natural resources. The artist used pencil shavings for his design. One can see how much natural resources we waste amongst ourselves just by looking at this one picture; the amount of wood wasted for really nothing. It's just interesting because you see how much we've grown and how we have grown brought about consequences, unfortunate consequences. The art work shows beauty in the unfortunate waste we produce.

This third one is by Tuan Andrew Nguyen, a Vietnamese artist and filmaker. The graffiti is simple and typical. You can see graffiti everywhere back in America. Graffiti was always a means of expression. What impressed me was the lack of freedom Vietnamese people had (well...with the present situation and all, it's pretty obvious). But this was interesting because of the video. People would get severely punished if caught tagging a wall. They would be tazored by the police. It just makes you see the freedom that we take granted. Sure we can get punished for tagging walls but the extent of the punishment is so different. The freedom of speech is something that is everso important.

With everything that is going around me right now, I never really realized the amount of freedom we truly have. It is so different. People say and you learn about that lack of freedom everywhere else but it really doesn't hit until you face it first hand. Just being in China and seeing the Vietnamese and Cambodian art...it just changes your perspective and lets you see how progression in other countries is just lacking because of such great restraints. The art, the emotion put in can't be described. It is just incredible to see how different and hard life can be when one is not allowed to express themselves.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Shanghai Calendar

September 3, Sh Contemporary party at Bund 18, 6-midnight (their invite below)
September 6, Shanghart and Shanghai Gallery of Art openings (Yang Fudong and Michael Lin respectively)
September 7, Song Dong opening at Zendai Museum + Ke Center Opening
September 8, Shanghai Biennial opens (Sept 9-Nov 16)
September 9, ShContemporary VIP Preview (Sept 10-13)
September 10, 2 pm - Arthub presents at ShContemporary: Zhao Chuan, an art historian from Shanghai, will talk about his book on the “Birth of Avantgarde in Shanghai.”
September 10, Yishu launch at Zendai
September 11, 2 pm - Arthub presents at ShContemporary: Shanghai-based Curator Biljana Ciric will launch and talk about her book “Rejected Collection” with CHARTA.
September 12, 2 pm - Arthub presents at ShContemporary: Birdhead (artists Song Tao and Ji Weiyu) will be on site to sign their limited-edition books.
September 12, 7.30 pm, Chinese Contemporary Art collector Sylvain Levy will speak to FCC. (venue TBD- will keep you posted)
September 13, 2 pm- Arthub presents at ShContemporary: A presentation of Asia Art Forum, an educational initiative for young collectors, art professionals and
enthusiasts.
October 17-22, E-arts festival (a city-wide celebration of new media)
October 22, Christian Marclay with Elliott Sharp, Wu Na, Ben Houge, Bruce Gremo, etc.


MOCA, James Cohan, Bizart missing.

Shanghai This Fall

September 3, Sh Contemporary party at Bund 18, 6-midnight (their
invite below)
September 6, Shanghart and Shanghai Gallery of Art openings (Yang
Fudong and Michael Lin respectively)
September 7, Song Dong opening at Zendai Museum + Ke Center Opening
September 8, Shanghai Biennial opens (Sept 9-Nov 16)
September 9, ShContemporary VIP Preview (Sept 10-13)
September 10, 2 pm - Arthub presents at ShContemporary: Zhao Chuan,
an art historian from Shanghai, will talk about his book on the
"Birth of Avantgarde in Shanghai."
September 10, Yishu launch at Zendai
September 11, 2 pm - Arthub presents at ShContemporary: Shanghai-
based Curator Biljana Ciric will launch and talk about her book
"Rejected Collection" with CHARTA.
September 12, 2 pm - Arthub presents at ShContemporary: Birdhead
(artists Song Tao and Ji Weiyu) will be on site to sign their limited-
edition books.
September 12, 7.30 pm, Chinese Contemporary Art collector Sylvain
Levy will speak to FCC. (venue TBD- will keep you posted)
September 13, 2 pm- Arthub presents at ShContemporary: A presentation
of Asia Art Forum, an educational initiative for young collectors,
art professionals and
enthusiasts.
October 17-22, E-arts festival (a city-wide celebration of new media)
October 22, Christian Marclay with Elliott Sharp, Wu Na, Ben Houge,
Bruce Gremo, etc.


MOCA, James Cohan, Bizart missing.

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

three openings this Saturday

Saturday openings:
-------------------------------------------------
Zhao Qin
26 April - 17 May 2008

Eastlink Gallery
Floor 5, Building 6
50 Moganshan Lu

Opening: Saturday, April 26, 6pm
-------------------------------------------------

There is also an opening at Ophoto that day at M50.
-------------------------------------------------

And the most interesting one seems it will be:
Art Multiple
_ first presented art multiple exhibition in China

Art For Everybody
Time: April 26, 2008 – May 12, 2008
Opening: 19:30 April 26, 2008.
Place: Ke Center for the Contemporary Arts
Artists Participating:
Gao Mingyan, Gu Wenda, Hu Jieming, Liu Ding, Birdhead, Sun Ling, Yang Yong, Zhang Enli, Zhang Jianjun, Adad Hannah, Agathe de Bailliencourt, Ho Tzu Nyen, Josefina Posch, Sandrine Ilouquet, Susanne M.Winterling, Vibeke Jensen, Will Kwan, Zulkifle Mahmod, La Mas Bella, Ted Noten, Hannah Louise Lammb, Julia de Ville, Chang young chia, Vincent Leong, Miljohn Ruperto, Wu Gao Zhong, Jin Feng, Hipic

"Art Multiple 2008 exhibition" will be first presented in April, 2008 at Ke Center for Contemporary Arts. Exhibition will present 35 artists from 10 different countries and areas all around the world. Nearly 200 art works will be showed. Which includes artists' exhibited works, specially commissioned works for Art Multiple and multipes of contemporary art works collected by famous international art institutions.

Art Multiple concept refers to the art works with relatively bigger editions determined by artist . This concept of multiple gives possibility of reaching higher audience and appreciation as well as possibility of collecting work for relatively affordable price trying to have contemporary art get out of its small circle of privileged. Abroad art multiple concept developed early in 60's and till today there are many galleries and institutions specialized in presenting multiples
Ke Center for Contemporary Arts through exhibition in April introduces concept to China and establishes first Art Multiple Supermarket in Shanghai hoping to make art for everyone possible

In the period of boom of Chinese art market and price increase from sale to sale, where small group of artists sells work for million dollars, where still collecting is taken for most of the buyers as a short term investment, Multiple provides new possibility in art market and artistic expression, that art works can be affordable to larger group of people and that anyone can be collector

This new concept at the same time works as an educating tool for new collectors in China and new collecting strategies in general.

During exhibition period different lectures and workshop will be held related to Art Multiple concept.

Ke Center for the Contemporary Arts will invite specialists work in the field of contemporary art market research to give talks.

We hope to introduce contemporary art into a larger crowd and to cultivate new collectors and a new way of collection.

Multiple as a type of art making and art collecting is not new concept. Concept started developing with Duchamp's ready mades objects in early decades of twentieth century.

Duchamp developed the term readymade in 1915 to refer to found objects chosen by the artist as art. Produced object-such as his Fountain (1917), a urinal that he turned on its side, signed "R. Mutt," Duchamp asserted that there was no longer a fundamental difference between making art and naming art. By the early 1960s many of Duchamp's readymades had taken the form of authorized, limited edition, handcrafted replicas and were considered valuable works of art that seemed to contradict their original intention.

In the 1950s and 1960s the term multiple came to be applied to a new type of art object that, while intended to be produced in numerous copies, fell outside the parameters of such traditional forms as printmaking and cast sculpture. Often fabricated using the materials and techniques of mass production, these objects typically existed in very large, or even unlimited, editions. Unlike painting and sculpture, or even traditional fine art printmaking, the multiple engaged directly with the conditions of industrial production, mass communication, and an increasingly global economy.

For the artists of the international avant-garde known as Fluxus, the multiple presented a means to revive and reformulate the readymade's critique of aesthetic autonomy. Fluxus sought to dethrone "serious" culture by creating objects and performances demonstrating that, as Maciunas said, "Anything can be art and anyone can do it."

Joseph Beuys (1921-1986) also looked to the readymade as he sought to bring art and life into closer proximity. For Beuys, the readymade became part of a larger effort to reinvest artistic activity with metaphorical, ritual, and even spiritual significance.

Although they often differed in their choice of strategies, Beuys and Maciunas shared many of the same goals including using art as a means of realizing social and political change, recognizing the importance of collective action, and eliminating the boundary between art and life. The production of multiples played a key role these efforts, often acting as a mediator between the production of objects and a growing emphasis on artistic process and action unfolding in real time.

Beuys, for his part, referred to his multiples both as vehicles for the spreading of ideas and as anchors that encouraged people to make connections between objects and across media.

It is certainly true of both Beuys and Fluxus multiples that the significance of a group of objects is almost always greater than the sum of its parts. Efforts of both Beuys and Maciunas to transform the ways in which art is exhibited and distributed."

In 1990's, artists Sarah Lucas and Tracey Emin took over a disused shop in London's East End and, with other artists friends including Damien Hirst, sold T-shirts, mugs and other customised items as works of art. This artist-led approach to selling art directly to the public not only re-popularised the artists multiple, but was a key moment in the subsequent Young British Artist era, culminating in the Saatchi collected "Sensation" exhibition.

Art multiple concept is to make contemporary art accessible to more people from collecting art point of view to spreading artists ideas